Archaeological Photography



MATT SCHLITZ

"Archaeology is the study of material remains of past human activity and excavation is a process of controlled destruction. Thus, from the outset, archaeologists recognized the potential of photography to permanently record their scientific work and to disseminate research ideas. Archaeological photography is the visual documentation of terrestrial or underwater cultural landscapes and associated sites, features, and artifacts. The archaeologist photographs the pre-excavated site, relationships between the site and surrounding landscape, site features and standing structures, artifacts, spatial association between artifacts, trench stratigraphy and excavation layers, field survey finds, and the final site exposed and cleaned. The archaeological photographer also records team members using equipment to illustrate archaeological methods for lectures and publications.

It is critical that archaeologists create the best possible image archive for future generations. The archaeologist as photographer knows what artifact detail or site viewpoints should be recorded for posterity. Archaeologists are required to develop good skills in photography as commercial photographers would rarely be employed for this type of photodocumentation. The resulting images should be correctly exposed and focused, suitably lit, and free of distortion with attention paid to accurate color representation. To indicate size it is essential to use a contrasting metric scale, a human figure, or the insertion of a hand. Photographic backgrounds, scales, and other information must not compete with the subject for attention. Documenting artifacts for museum publications, exhibitions, or public lectures may require some interpretative approach.

The archaeological photographer is often challenged by heat, moisture, cold, wind, dust, terrain, vegetation, and the pressure of rescue archaeology with limited time. Dealing with high contrast on a site in bright sunlight and achieving contrast
in a wet trench are other challenges. The archaeological photographer must apply different composition and lighting methods to a wide variety of artifact types and composite materials such as pottery, coins, glass, bone, metal, stone, wood, and textiles. Aerial photography and satellite imagery are extremely useful recording, prospection, and analytical tools for the archaeologist. Low-level aerial archaeology platforms such as kite aerial photography, balloon photography, and photographic booms are constructed by specialists to obtain aesthetic vertical and oblique site images that are also useful when creating large-scale photo mosaics, site plans, and three-dimensional topographic models.

Scientific photographers employ infrared, ultraviolet, and multispectral imaging techniques to highlight detail in ancient textiles, painted wood, canvas, leather, and the ink on parchment such as revealed on the Dead Sea scrolls. Fluorescence photography can distinguish the presence of organic and mineral elements on wall paintings and textiles and xeroradiography can assist conservators in the restoration of metal artifacts. Archaeologists exploring tombs or confined spaces utilize endoscopic photography and optical fiber technology. Photomicrography and scanning electron microscopy are tools for archaeologists to analyze animal and plant residues. Stereoscopic imagery can bring out variations in texture or technological construction in features or artifacts. Although video has not figured prominently in methodical archaeological imaging, it has played a large role in recording celebrity archaeologists and objects for popular television documentaries. Maritime archaeologists use either purpose-built underwater camera systems with electronic flashes or housings for land cameras.

The greatest change in archaeological photography is the development of digital imaging. It is critical that digital cameras and other devices provide high-quality archival records. The use of large format or medium format cameras with digital backs is still the ideal in archaeology because of the level of detail and image enlargement obtainable from the negative or file. However, most archaeological photographers tend to use 35-mm SLR and digital SLR equipment because of the expense of the larger formats and for ease of handling on site. Macro lenses are a must for artifact photography and additional equipment is required to replicate studio conditions in the field.

Digital imaging offers the potential to speed up the documentation of endangered sites due to development, weather, and war. The digital images can be processed anywhere for virtual exhibitions and archives. The development of close-range three-dimensional laser scanning allows archaeologists to create virtual monuments, record ancient interiors, and illustrate sites using “fly-through” movies. Photogrammetric cameras and software can be used to survey panels of rock art or document heritage buildings. Photomodeler software provides a photo-realistic, three-dimensional model of the ship, artifact, building, or site by measuring from and incorporating the original photographs. High-resolution document scanners can be used to record low-profile artifacts such as ceramic shards, glass beads, and bone. Archaeologists use image registration software to rejoin mosaics, architectural columns, and pottery from scanned or photographed fragments. Digital image processing has shed light on difficult-to-detect rock art images, providing the archaeologist with a new dating tool and a potentially vast corpus of art.

As in many other disciplines, digital imaging has provided greater opportunities for archaeologists to store, retrieve, and disseminate research images over the Internet, via image databases, or on optical media. Low-cost CD/DVD burners, USB ports, memory cards, card readers, and wireless technology make duplicating and image transfer between field, laboratory, or office easy. The challenge is to ensure authenticity of the original digital image when manipulation of the image may affect research outcomes. Image duplication and preservation must be carefully considered in the future as file formats change. The RAW file format will emerge as the glass plate negative of old, but it is not yet standard among camera manufacturers. Digital asset management software such as Fotostation, Extensis Portfolio, and Cumulus are efficient tools to manage archaeological image workflows. Adobe PhotoShop software can be used to create composite illustrations by combining photographs, vector, and raster information.

Archaeological photographers need to be comfortable with digital imaging technology. World wide, countless archeological images will be uploaded to image servers to provide comparative artifact typologies and site analysis. Knowledge of color management software, digital asset management, file workflows, and format conversion will become critical for maintaining the integrity of images. Archaeologists now provide daily posting of digital images or real-time video to project Web sites. Archaeologists in the field are also able to process images faster by wireless technology and developing mobile phone technology will provide immediate feedback for isolated survey teams. Some digital SLR models provide global positioning satellite (GPS) connectivity to enable spatial EXIF data to feed into geographic information systems (GIS) databases. Hand-held three-dimensional laser scanning cameras may be eventually developed, with instrument software to provide three-dimensional “point clouds” corresponding with texture from photographic frames. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will be used by archaeologists in the future to undertake low-level aerial archaeology projects as well.

Archaeological photography has been revolutionized by digital imaging and further convergence of the technology will lead to innovative applications in the field and laboratory. However, archaeologists today still rely on the glass negatives and prints from the past, which have stood the test of time. Whatever the technology, the challenge for archaeological photographers is to provide a permanent archive of our cultural heritage that is equal to or surpasses the photographic standards of the past."

in: Archaeological Photography

Fotografia: Ricardo Soares & Sara Navarro


Cave of Forgotten Dreams


SYNOPSIS

Following his previous documentary Encounters at the End of the World, iconic director Werner Herzog once again takes us deep behind the frontier of an extraordinary place. Having gained unprecedented access through the tightest of restrictions and overcome considerable technical challenges, he has captured on film, with specially designed 3D cameras, the interior of the Chauvet Cave in southern France. This is where the world’s oldest cave paintings – hundreds in number - were discovered in 1994. In the mesmerising Cave of Forgotten Dreams, he reveals to us a breathtaking subterranean world and leads us to the 32,000-year-old artworks. In that deeply moving moment of encounter, we come face to face with pristine and astonishingly realistic drawings of horses, cattle and lions, which for the briefest second come alive in the torchlight. In true Herzogian fashion, his hypnotically engaging narration weaves in wider metaphysical contemplations as we learn more about the Paleolithic art and its creators. Through his understated and gently humorous voiceover, we are invited to reflect on our primal desire to communicate and represent the world around us, evolution and our place within it, and ultimately what it means to be human.


Nanook of the North


A Story of Life and Love in the "Actual" Arctic

A 1922 silent documentary film by Robert J. Flaherty. In the tradition of what would later be called salvage ethnography, Flaherty captured the struggles of the Inuk Nanook and his family in the Canadian arctic. The film is considered the first feature-length documentary, though Flaherty has been criticized for staging several sequences and thereby distorting the reality of his subjects' lives.

In 1989, this film was one of the first 25 films to be selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".


Uma Cidade 2 Fotógrafos


 
Portimão | Júlio Bernardo (1916) & Francisco Oliveira (1918)

Exposição
Museu de Portimão
17.12.2011 - 29.04.2012

"Através da fotografia, Júlio Bernardo e Francisco Oliveira, fixaram instantes da vida quotidiana de Portimão, devolvendo-nos as imagens do seu olhar atento a esse constante movimento que, desde a década de 50 até finais dos anos 70 do século XX, foi construindo e moldando a cidade, o particularismo dos seus espaços e as formas da sua paisagem humana."


Obrigado!

A Fenda da Arrábida


A Fenda constitui um “geomonumento” de rara beleza natural, há muito conhecido, mas sem informação arqueológica publicada (no prelo). A verticalidade e dureza das suas paredes tem proporcionado uma verdadeira Meca para os amantes da escalada, que equiparam aquela arquitectura natural com várias vias de diferentes graus de dificuldade.

Como o próprio topónimo indica, trata-se de um acidente tectónico, que se abre ao longo de aproximadamente 700 metros na encosta sul da Serra da Arrábida, sobranceiro e paralelo à linha de praia do Portinho. Este fenómeno terá sido provavelmente causado pela orogenia que verticalizou aquela junta de estratificação, ao ponto de a abrir numa grande brecha onde se desenvolveu um submundo de maravilha e viçosa luxúria, na qual a luz se perde numa penumbra de verdes e cambiantes de terra e argila.

A acção erosiva das águas orgânicas corroeu aquele espaço num labiríntico complexo de ocos propícios à exploração humana, proporcionando, assim, uma potencial área de habitat e abrigo, com diversos recantos apelativos, também, para uma utilização ritual. Porém, a sua prospectabilidade é de manifesta dificuldade, pelo facto de a área se desenvolver como uma imensa bacia de dejecção sedimentar, culminada por uma espessa camada de manta morta em constante produção. Se, por uma lado, os sedimentos escondem por completo os presumíveis vestígios arqueológicos, por outro, selam-nos, preservando de forma exemplar a sua latente informação, a aguardar uma oportuna intervenção de sondagem. Ainda assim, foram identificados alguns fragmentos de cerâmica manual, e um grande búzio (“buzina” – Charonia lampas) depositado numa pequena cavidade aberta num caos de blocos.

Tendo em conta as singulares particularidades deste local e a sua insinuante integração na rede de povoamento loco-regional do Bronze Final, destacando-se a “umbilical” proximidade e intervisibilidade com o povoado da Serra da Cela (a escassos 500 metros), será admissível atribuir-lhe uma funcionalidade de acessório abrigo sazonal, de apoio, controlo e defesa do porto subjacente, além de eventuais atribuições rituais. Outras cronologias também devem ser tidas em conta. Recorde-se que a área do Portinho da Arrábida tem vindo a documentar uma sequência de ocupação praticamente ininterrupta, a que o sítio da Fenda não terá certamente passado despercebido.

Outros sinais de ocupação...

A Arrábida no Bronze Final - a Paisagem e o Homem
Ricardo Soares
(2012)
Dissertação de Mestrado em Arqueologia
Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa